User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; JY-G2 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.94 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 41.0Android 4.1unknown JiayuG2Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 41.0Blink Android 4.1JiayuG2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.94closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 41.0.2272.94closeAndroid 4.1.2GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.256 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 41.0Blink Android 4.1JiayuJY-G2smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.94closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 41.0.2272closeAndroid 4.1.2JiayuJY-G2closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.94WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 41Blink Android 4.1.2JiayuG2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.94closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:10 | by ThaDafinser