User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; PadFone) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.34 Safari/534.24
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AsusPadFone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 11.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.14499 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 11.0.696.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 11.0.696.34closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 11.0WebKit GNU/Linux AsusPadFonesmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 11.0.696.34closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 11.0.696closeLinux AsusPadFonecloseclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 11.0.696.34closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.914 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 11.0.696.34WebKit 534.24Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.696 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 11Webkit 534.24Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 11.0.696.34closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:10 | by ThaDafinser