User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; ja-JP; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/pc_windows.yaml
UNKNOWN Windows Vista NT 6.0 pc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 7.1Gecko WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.05099 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Navigator 7.1closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.25 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows Vistadesktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Netscape Navigator 7.1closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 7.1closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Netscape 7.1closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 7.1Gecko 20030624Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.439 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape 7.1Gecko 1.4Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:10 | by ThaDafinser