User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; IdeaTab S6000-H Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.114 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
Chrome 34.0Android 4.2unknown VodafoneIdeaTab S6000-HTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 34.0Blink Android 4.2VodafoneIdeaTab S6000-HTabletyesyes0.06599 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.285 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 34.0Blink Android 4.2LenovoIdeaTab S6000tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 34.0.1847closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoIdeaTab S6000-Hcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.072 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.114WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 34Blink Android 4.2.2LenovoIdeaTab S6000tabletyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 24closeAndroid 4.2LenovoIdeaTabTabletyesyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:09 | by ThaDafinser