User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/538.2+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0.5 Safari/536.30.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-safari.yaml
WebKit Nightly Build OS X Lion 10.7Webkit 538.2desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 6.0WebKit MacOSX 10.7AppleMacintoshDesktop0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.0.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 6.0.5closeOS X 10.7.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 6.0WebKit Mac 10.7desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.0.5closeOS X 10.7.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 538.2closeMac OS X 10.7.5closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.0.5closeOS X 10.7.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.068 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 6.0.5WebKit 538.2Mac OS X 10.7.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
WebKit Nightly Build Webkit 538.2OS X Lion 10.7desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.0.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 6.0.5closeMac OS X 10.7.5Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:09 | by ThaDafinser