User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Symbian; U; S60 V5; xx; NokiaE7-00) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.2.0.336 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 9.2Series60 5Gecko NokiaE7-00mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.2U2 SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeSymbian OS NokiaE7-00mobile-browseryescloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.2 Symbian OS Series 60 V5NokiaE7-00smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 1.0.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.2.0closeSymbian OS NokiaE7-00closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeSymbian closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.2.0.336 NokiaOS NokiaNokia E7-00closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.2Gecko Series60 5NokiaE7-00mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Web Browser on Symbian 9closeSymbian S60 5NokiaE7-00Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.12299 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:09 | by ThaDafinser