User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9a3pre) Gecko/20070301 Minefield/3.0a3pre
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firefox Minefield (3.0)GNU/Linux Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.9Gecko 1.9Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.10599 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox (Minefield) 3.0a3precloseLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox Minefield (3.0)Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.9acloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox (Minefield) 3.0.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Minefield 3.0a3precloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.089 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Minefield 3.0a3preGecko 20070301Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Minefield 3.0a3Gecko 1.9a3Linux desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:08 | by ThaDafinser