User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; AT-AS45qHD Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.72 Mobile Safari/537.36 OPR/16.0.1212.64462
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
WolfgangAT-AS45qHD Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 16.0.1212.64462closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 16.0.1212.64462closeAndroid 4.2.1GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.289 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 4.2yes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 16.0.1212.64462closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 16.0.1212closeAndroid 4.2.1WolfgangAT-AS45qHDcloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.149 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 16.0.1212.64462WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 4.2.1WolfgangAT-AS45QHDmobile:smartyescloseclose0.035 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 16.0.1212.64462closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.08099 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:08 | by ThaDafinser