User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; RCT6773W22 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.109 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Chrome 40.0.2214.109Android 4.4.2Blink RCA TabletsRCT6773W22tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 40.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.09299 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.109closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.109closeAndroid 4.4.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.326 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 40.0Blink Android 4.4RCA TabletsRCT6773W22tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.109closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 40.0.2214closeAndroid 4.4.2RCT6773W22closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.09 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.109WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.453 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 40Blink Android 4.4.2RCT6773W22tabletyescloseclose0.07701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.109closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 40closeAndroid 4.4RCARCT6773W22Tabletyesyescloseclose0.09099 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:07 | by ThaDafinser