User agent detail

Opera/4.0 (Windows 98;US) [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 4.0Windows 98 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Win98 98Windows DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 4.0closeWindows 98desktop-browsercloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 4.0Presto Windows 98desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 4.0closeWindows 98closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 4.0closeWindows 98 closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 4.0closeWindows 98 closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 4.0 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.423 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 4.0 Windows 98desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 4.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:07 | by ThaDafinser