User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.1; de-de; HL-PC1088 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.30 Mobile UCBrowser/3.4.3.532
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
UC Browser 3.4Android 4.2unknown HonlinPC1088Desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 3.4WebKit Android 4.2HonlinPC1088Desktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.1GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 3.4WebKit Android 4.2yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 3.4.3closeAndroid 4.2.1HL-PC1088closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.089 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 3.4.3.532WebKit 534.30Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 3.4Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.1HL-PC1088mobile:smartyescloseclose0.08001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:07 | by ThaDafinser