User agent detail

Mozilla 5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Win Phone os 7.5; Trident/50; IE Mobile/9.0; HTC;MWP6985
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCMWP6985 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake BrowserBot/Crawler0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 9.0Trident HTCMWP6985smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 9.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 9.0close HTCMWP6985closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 9.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.124 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 9.0Trident 50 HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 9.0Trident 50 closeclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:05 | by ThaDafinser