User agent detail

Opera/9.70 (Windows NT 5.1; U; xx) TMO-US_LEO
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Opera 9.70Windows XP desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.70closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.70closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.70Presto Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.70closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.70closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.70closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.045 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.70 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 9.70 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.70closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 9.26closeIntel Mac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:05 | by ThaDafinser