User agent detail

Mozilla/4.1 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Symbian OS; Nokia 3650;424) Opera 6.10 [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia3650 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.06799 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 6.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 6.10closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 6.10Presto Symbian OS Nokia3650smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 6.10closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 6.10closeSymbian OS Nokia3650closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 6.10closeSymbian OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.173 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 6.10 Symbian Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 6.10 Series60 Nokia3650mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Nokia3650Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:04 | by ThaDafinser