User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS armv7l 6457.83.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML,like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.93 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-811.php
Chrome 40.0ChromeOS unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 40.0Blink ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop0.27197 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.93closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.93closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 40.0Blink Chrome OS 6457.83desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.93closeChrome OS 40.0.2214.93closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 40.0.2214closeChrome OS 6457.83.0closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.93closeChrome OS 6457.83.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.93WebKit 537.36ChromeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 40Blink Chrome OS desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.93closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:04 | by ThaDafinser