User agent detail

LG-GB255-parrot/V100 Obigo/WAP2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UNTRUSTED/1.0 Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; fr-CM; lg-gb255-parrot) UCBrowser8.3.1.161/70/352/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGGB255 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.08199 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-GB255-parrot V100closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.3 LGGB255smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.3.1close LGGB255closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.12 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo WAP2 Browser WAP2 LGLGGB255closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo WAP 2.0 LGGB255mobile:featureyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close LGGB255Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:04 | by ThaDafinser