User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 2.3.5; en-US; TLINK350) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.2.0.242 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
UC Browser 8.2.0.242Android 2.3.5 ThomsonTlink350smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.2U2 Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux TecnoN3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.262 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.2 Android 2.3ThomsonTlink350smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.0closeAndroid 2.3.5closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.2.0.242 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.2Gecko Android 2.3.5ThomsonTlink350mobile:smartyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:04 | by ThaDafinser