User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-I9050_TD/1.0 Android/2.3.6 Release/01.15.2012 Browser/AppleWebKit533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I9050 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-I9050 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6SamsungGT-I9050mobile-browseryescloseclose0.255 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3SamsungGT-I9050smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 2.3.6SamsungGT-I9050closeclosecloseclose0.03 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.6SamsungGT-I9050mobile:smartyescloseclose0.027 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 2.3closeAndroid 2.3SamsungGT-I9050Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.15502 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:03 | by ThaDafinser