User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:25.7) Gecko/20151012 PaleMoon/25.7.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-814.php
PaleMoon 25.7Win10 10.025.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
PaleMoon 25.7Gecko 25.0Win10 10.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Pale Moon 25.7.3closeWindows 10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Pale Moon 25.7Gecko Windows 10desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows 10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Pale Moon (Firefox Variant) 25.7.3closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Palemoon 25.7.3closeWindows 10 closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Pale Moon 25.7.3Gecko 20151012Windows Windows NT 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Pale Moon 25.7.3Gecko 25.7Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.08901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:03 | by ThaDafinser