User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; de; rv:1.9.1.6) Gecko/20091201 (WEB.DE/1.5) Firefox/3.5.6 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firefox 3.5.6Windows VistaGecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.5Gecko 1.9.1WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.08201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.5.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.5.6closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.5Gecko Windows Vistadesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.5.6closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.5.6closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.5.6closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.5.6Gecko 20091201Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.497 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.5.6Gecko 1.9.1Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.5.6closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 3.5.6closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:03 | by ThaDafinser