User agent detail

DCL SuperMosaic/1.0.2.9J_Win32
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-mosaic.yaml
SuperMosaic 1.0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
DCL closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
SuperMosaic 1.0.2.9closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.206 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mosaic 1.0.2.9J Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SuperMosaic 1.0 Windows desktopcloseclose0.026 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:02 | by ThaDafinser