User agent detail

HTC-PI39100/UCWEB2.8.0.249/47/355
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCPI39100 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
HTC-PI39100 UCWEB2.8.0.249closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.207 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 2.8 HTCPI39100smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 2.8.0close HTCPI39100closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.8.0.249close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 2.8.0.249 HTC PI39100closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.401 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 2.8Gecko HTCPI39100mobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:02 | by ThaDafinser