User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows Phone OS 7.5; Trident/5.0; IEMobile/9.0; SAMSUNG; SMG-917R)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSMG-917R Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 9.0Trident 5.0WinPhone7.5 7.5Mobile Phoneyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 9.0closeWindows 7.5GenericWindows Phone 7.5mobile-browseryescloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 9.0Trident Windows Phone 7.5SamsungSMG-917Rsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows Phone closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 9.0closeWindows Phone 7.5SamsungSMG-917Rcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 9.0closeWindows Phone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile 9.0Trident 5.0Windows Phone closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.481 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 9.0Trident 5.0Windows Phone 7.5SAMSUNGSMG-917Rmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile 9.0closeWindows Phone 7.5Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:02 | by ThaDafinser