User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Debian Firefox/25.0 Iceweasel/25.0 Gnome
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Iceweasel 25.0Debian Gecko 25.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Iceweasel 25.0Gecko 25.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.08401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 25.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IceWeasel 25.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Iceweasel 25.0Gecko Debian desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 25.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Iceweasel 25.0closeDebian closeclosecloseclose0.022 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iceweasel 25.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.074 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Iceweasel 25.0Gecko 20100101Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Iceweasel 25.0Gecko 25.0Debian desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 25.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 25.0closeWindows 8Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:02 | by ThaDafinser