User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android Cricket Eclair 2.1-update1; en-us; SAMSUNG Intercept SPH-M910 Build/ECLAIR) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungIntercept SPH-M910 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.07701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.298 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android SamsungSPH-M910smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.0closeAndroid SamsungIntercept SPH-M910closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.045 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 530.17Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 530.17Android 2.0SamsungIntercept SPH-M910mobile:smartyescloseclose0.15202 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.05501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:02 | by ThaDafinser