User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux mips; U; InettvBrowser/2.2 (00014A;SonyDTV115;0002;0100) KDL22EX540; CC/JPN; xx) Presto/2.10.250 Version/11.60
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/sony.yaml
Opera Devices 3.2 Presto 2.10.250SonyBravia EX540 Smart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.60Presto 2.10Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.60closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.60Presto GNU/Linux SonyKDL22EX540tv0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.60closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.60closeLinux SonyDTV115closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.60closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.087 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet TV Browser 2.2Presto 2.10.250Linux Sony KDL-22EX540 Digital TVcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.2Presto 2.10.250 SonyBravia EX540 Smart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.60closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:01 | by ThaDafinser