User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; de) AppleWebKit/533.19.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) AdobeAIR/13.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-500.php
Adobe AIR 13.0MacOSX 10unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Adobe AIR 13.0WebKit MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 533.19.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Adobe AIR runtime 13.0closeOS X software-librarycloseclose0.358 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mac desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
AppleMail 533.19.4closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Adobe AIR 13.0WebKit 533.19.4Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.487 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
AdobeAIR 13.0Webkit 533.19.4OS X desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:01 | by ThaDafinser