User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 Linux U Android 2.2.1 en-us SCH-I500 Build/MIUI AppleWebKit/533.1 KHTML, like Gecko Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSCH-I500 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid GenericAndroid 2.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.259 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2SamsungSCH-I500smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.2.1closeAndroid 2.2.1SamsungSCH-I500closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.2.1Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.2.1SamsungFascinatemobile:smartyescloseclose0.031 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:01 | by ThaDafinser