User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; Fly IQ430 Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.166 Mobile Safari/537.36 OPR/20.0.1396.73172
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
FlyIQ430 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 20.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.18002 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 20.0.1396.73172closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 20.0.1396.73172closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.258 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 20.0Blink Android 4.2FlyIQ430smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 20.0.1396.73172closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 20.0.1396closeAndroid 4.2.2FlyIQ430closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.146 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 20.0.1396.73172WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 20.0Blink Android 4.1.1FlyIQ430 Evokemobile:smartyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 20.0.1396.73172closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:01 | by ThaDafinser