User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; i6 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/30.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36 ACHEETAHI/2100501072
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
CM Browser 0.0Android 4.4unknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CM Browser Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2Stari6mobile-browseryescloseclose0.288 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 30.0Blink Android 4.4smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 30.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.2i6closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.0.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium WebView 30Blink Android 4.4.2i6mobile:smartyescloseclose0.08601 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Stari6Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.18502 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:01 | by ThaDafinser