User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Symbian; U; S60 V5; en-US; VertuConstellation T) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.1.0.319 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaS60 V5 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.1U2 SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeSymbian OS SonyEricssonP1imobile-browseryescloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.1 Symbian OS Series 60 V5NokiaMobilefeature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.1.0closeSymbian OS NokiaS60 V5closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeSymbian closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.1.0.319 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.1Gecko Series60 5VertuConstellation T) U2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:01 | by ThaDafinser