User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; GT-P6810 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-P6810 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 535.19closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4SamsungGalaxy Tab 7.7mobile-browseryescloseclose0.252 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0SamsungGALAXY Tab 7.7"tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.4closeAndroid 4.0.4SamsungGT-P6810closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 535.19Android 4.0.4Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 535.19Android 4.0.4SamsungGalaxy Tab 7.7tabletyescloseclose0.032 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 4.0closeAndroid 4.0SamsungGP-P6810Tabletyesyescloseclose0.09101 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:00 | by ThaDafinser