User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SMART-TV; Linux) AppleWebkit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) like Chrome ; Safari/538.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/samsung.yaml
Webkit 538.1SamsungSmart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebkit 538.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 538.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.179 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome WebKit GNU/Linux SamsungSmart TVtv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 538.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.103 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome WebKit 538.1Smart TV closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.417 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 538.1 SamsungSmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:59 | by ThaDafinser