User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SAMSUNG; SAMSUNG-GT-I9500/1.0; U; Tizen/1.0 like Android; xx) AppleWebKit/535.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) SLP Browser/1.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-tizen.yaml
Samsung Browser Tizen 1.0Webkit 535.7SamsungGT-I9500 prototypemobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 535.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Tizen Browser 1.0closeTizen desktop-browsercloseclose0.207 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Tizen Browser 1.0WebKit Tizen 1.0SamsungGT-I9500smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Tizen Browser 1.0closeTizen 1.0SamsungSAMSUNG-GT-I9500closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.091 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 535.7Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Samsung Browser Webkit 535.7Tizen 1.0SamsungGT-I9500 prototypemobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android close TizenFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:59 | by ThaDafinser