User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.2; ru-; TAB917QC-8GB Build/KVT49L) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.24 T5/2.0 bdbrowser_i18n/4.6.0.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-563.php
Baidu Browser 4.6Android 4.4unknown SunstechTAB917QC 8GBTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Baidu Browser 4.6T5 Android 4.4SunstechTAB917QC 8GBTabletyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.308 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.4yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.4.2closeAndroid 4.4.2TAB917QC-8GBcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.072 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.24Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.433 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Baidu Browser 4.6.0.7Webkit 534.24Android 4.4.2TAB917QC-8GBmobile:smartyescloseclose0.08601 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.031 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:58 | by ThaDafinser