User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SAMSUNG; SAMSUNG-GT-S5380K/S5380KDDKK6; U; Bada/2.0; en-us) AppleWebKit/534.20 (KHTML, like Gecko) Dolfin/3.0 Mo
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-S5380K Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dolfin 3.0WebKit Bada 2.0SamsungGT-S5380Mobile Phoneyes0.041 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.20closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 3.0closeBada 2.0SamsungGT-S5380Kmobile-browseryescloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Dolphin 3.0WebKit Bada 2.0SamsungGT-S5380Ksmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 3.0closeBada 2.0SamsungGT-S5380Kcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 3.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.072 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534.20 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 3.0Webkit 534.20Bada 2.0SamsungWave Ymobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Dolfin Browser 3.0closeBada 2.0SamsungGT-S5380KFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:58 | by ThaDafinser