User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071127 Firefox/2.0.0.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-039.php
Firefox 2.0WinXP 5.11.8 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 2.0Gecko 1.8WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.08801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 2.0.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 2.0.0.1closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 2.0Gecko Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 2.0.0.1closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 2.0.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 2.0.0.1closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.097 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 2.0.0.1Gecko 20071127Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 2.0.0.1Gecko 1.8.1Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 2.0.0.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:58 | by ThaDafinser