User agent detail

Liferea/1.10.6 (Linux; en_US.UTF8; http://liferea.sf.net/) AppleWebKit (KHTML, like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/feed_reader.yml
Liferea 1.10.6GNU/Linux desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesLifereaRSS0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Liferea 1.10.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Liferea 1.10.6closeLinux feed-readercloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Liferea 1.10 GNU/Linux desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.083 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Gecko based browser WebKit Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Liferea 1.10.6 Linux closeclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:58 | by ThaDafinser