User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; Lenovo A820t Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/43.0.2357.93 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-732.php
Chrome 43.0Android 4.2unknown LenovoA820tMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 43.0Blink Android 4.2LenovoA820tMobile Phoneyesyes0.11101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 43.0.2357.93closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.256 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 43.0Blink Android 4.2LenovoA820tsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 43.0.2357closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoA820tcloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.93WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.4 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 43Blink Android 4.2.2LenovoA820mobile:smartyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:58 | by ThaDafinser