User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.6; zh-CN; GT-I8250 Build/GINGERBREAD) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.5.1.381 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I8250 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.5U3 Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.07201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.6SamsungGT-I8250mobile-browseryescloseclose0.255 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.5WebKit Android 2.3SamsungGT-I8250smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.5.1closeAndroid 2.3.6SamsungGT-I8250closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.5.1.381WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.6Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.5Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.6SamsungGT-I8250mobile:smartyescloseclose0.027 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:57 | by ThaDafinser