User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; Archos 50 Oxygen Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.99 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Archos50 Oxygen Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 32.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.246 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 32.0Blink Android 4.2Archos50 Oxygensmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 32.0.1700closeAndroid 4.2.2Archos50 Oxygencloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.99WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 32Blink Android 4.2.2Archos50 Oxygenmobile:smartyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:57 | by ThaDafinser