User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Symbian OS; Nokia 3230/3.0505.2; 1657) Opera 8.60 [ru]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia3230 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Windows DesktopDesktop0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.60closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.60Presto Symbian OS Nokia3230smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.60closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.60closeSymbian OS Nokia3230closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.60closeSymbian OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.60 Symbian Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.414 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 8.60 Series60 Nokia3230mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Nokia3230Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:57 | by ThaDafinser