User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/535.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/16.0.912.75 Safari/535.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/pc_misc.yaml
Chrome 16.0.912.75Linux pc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 16.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 16.0.912.75closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 16.0.912.75closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 16.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 16.0.912.75closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 16.0.912closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 16.0.912.75closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.196 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 16.0.912.75WebKit 535.7Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 16Webkit 535.7Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 16.0.912.75closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 16.0.912.77closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:56 | by ThaDafinser