User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 5.0) Opera 12.12
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 12.12Windows 2000 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.12Presto 2.12Win2000 5.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.12closeWindows 5.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.12Presto Windows 2000desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.12closeWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.12closeWindows 2000 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.12closeWindows 2000 closecloseclosecloseclose0.042 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.12 Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 12.12 Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:56 | by ThaDafinser