User agent detail

curl/7.14.1 (i386-portbld-freebsd4.7) libcurl/7.14.1 OpenSSL/0.9.8 zlib/1.1.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
FreeBSD 4.7 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yescURLBot/Crawler0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
curl 7.14.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
cURL 7.14.1closeBSD 4.7software-librarycloseclose0.221 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
curl 7.14 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
curl 7.14.1closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.074 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
cURL 7.14.1 FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
FreeBSD 4.7closeclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.08901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:56 | by ThaDafinser