User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; ru-ru; HTC_One_X Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-025.php
Android 4.0Android 4.2unknown HTCOne XMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.2HTCOne XMobile Phoneyesyes0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2HTCPJ83100mobile-browseryescloseclose0.254 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2HTCOne Xsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2HTCOne Xcloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.2.2HTC One Xcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.2HTCOne Xmobile:smartyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2HTCPJ83100Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.046 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:55 | by ThaDafinser