User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) MxNitro/1.0.0.500 Chrome/35.0.1849.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-maxthon.yaml
Maxthon Nitro 1.0.0Windows XPBlink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Maxthon Nitro 1.0Blink WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.14701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.179 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 35.0Blink Windows XPdesktop0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 35.0.1849closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1849.0WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Maxthon Nitro 1.0.0Blink Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.14802 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:55 | by ThaDafinser