User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) KHTML/4.8.4 (like Gecko) Konqueror/4.8
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-295.php
Konqueror 4.8Linux unknown4.8 unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 4.8KHTML 4.8Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.8closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18398 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.8KHTML GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 4.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.8closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.022 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 4.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.08199 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.8 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42196 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.8KHTML 4.8.4Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:54 | by ThaDafinser