User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Dragon/42.2.2.138 Chrome/42.0.2311.135 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
Dragon 42.2Win8.1 6.3unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dragon 42.2Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.135closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 42.0.2311.135closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.24498 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 42.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.135closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 42.0.2311closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 42.0.2311.135closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.06199 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 42.0.2311.135WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.55594 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Comodo Dragon 42.2Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.135closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 42.0.0.10338closeWindows 10Desktopcloseclose0.032 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:54 | by ThaDafinser