User agent detail

RomeoLive/2.14 (HTC Sensation XL with Beats Audio X315e REL/4.0.3)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCSensation XL with Beats Audio X315e REL Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
RomeoLive 2.14closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close HTCSensation XL with Beats Audio X315e RELmobile-browseryescloseclose0.26497 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
HTCSensation XLsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close HTCSensation XL with Beats Audio X315e RELcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39796 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
HTCSensation XL with Beats Audio X315e RELmobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:53 | by ThaDafinser